Re: None of you dumbasses bought SSWH did you?

"lurknowhere" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> "Jnc" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
> news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > On Wed, 26 Nov 2003 12:44:46 -0500, SToX JeDI
> > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > > In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Jnc <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > > wrote:
> > >
> > > > Do you think that two posts that just say SSWH as the subject and as
> > > > the entire content of the message is considere "multiple times" and
is
> > > > considered to mean to "buy it"?  Not to mention that it's down,
again.
> > > > It figures, coming from a moron like you.  After all, you worship
> > > > morons, like Bush, so what can be expected.
> > >
> > > Multiple = more than once - ask your sister what it means - so yes.
> > > And it's up 4%, shit for brains.  Damn, you Liberals built this
> > > education system and obviously feel it's working.  Wrong.
> >
> >
> > Hey moron, when the post was made, it was down.  Get a clue.
> > Damn, you right-wing extremists are really stupid.  Guess you never
> > learned how to read time or correlate.  Or you just haven't gotten
> > that far in school yet.  Look it up or ask your daddy.
> >
>
> You're reading all the wrong signals, pal.  Relax before someone calls in
a
> thread cleaner.
> (SSWH +++)

They make my framing hammer look smart.
SH