
www.Usenet.com
| <-- __Chronological__ --> | <-- __Thread__ --> |
"John A. Weeks III" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message news:<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>... > In article > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, > Elizabeth Richardson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Does this mean that you think one should have zero cash? > Not at all. Cash is handy to have for emergencies and buying > opportunities. But don't keep the majority of your nest egg > in cash because you think it is 100% safe. Rather, it is just > the opposite, cash is the only common investment that is going > to for sure be a loser. Keeping cash has a cost...don't have > any more in your account than what is prudent to pay for. A person can also reduce the need for cash by improving cash flow through staggering CDs and bonds so that they become due on a regular basis. As your interest income goes up, you will have less of a need for cash on hand. Many brokers will give low cost loans against your stock holdings reducing your need for cash. -- Ron
| <-- __Chronological__ --> | <-- __Thread__ --> |