
www.Usenet.com
| <-- __Chronological__ --> | <-- __Thread__ --> |
Tad Borek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > and Fidelity. That's assuming you need a broker at all - most > beginning investors stick with mutual funds, and if you buy funds from > say Vanguard, you don't have a brokerage account at all (you have an > account with the fund company). To further elaborate - if you have several funds with Vanguard, _without_ an actual brokerage account, you can still swap money between various Vanguard funds online, quickly and easily. Now, I do think that Vanguard's web designers ought to be fired. The site is annoying as hell, popping up new windows all the time for every little thing. It was a lot nicer before a redesign they did a couple of years ago. It took them a while to get rid of some annoying javascript bugs, too. But as annoying as I find it, it does work. So if all you have are Vanguard funds, it's kind of no-brainer. On the other hand, I've never heard anything good about their brokerage services. > If you want mutual funds that are available through brokerage firms, > or if you want to trade stocks...well the reality is that the majors > are very similar in cost and fund offerings and you might just pick > based on the look/usability of the web site. People who trade a lot And, as you said, I'd lean towards one of the biggies - Fidelity, Schwab, etc. Bear in mind that certain funds are not available, and that their "no transaction fee" deals require you to be locked into a fund for a minimum of 6 months (I think - it's several months, anyway). Recently, Schwab raised what they were charging the fund companies themselves for inclusion in the NTF programs and several funds revolted. > Depending on where you live, you might consider an online broker that > also has a local branch close by. Not that you will use it all that I'll second that, too. While I hardly ever actually have to do so, I find it comforting to be able to walk across the street from my office and deposit checks into my brokerage account. And I do actually do so about once every couple of months. They even have nice self-serve machines which take the check, scan it, and print an image of it on the receipt. Very slick. > deposits, last-minute IRA contributions, odd forms that you can't get > online, etc - it's nice to have a branch nearby. That might narrow it Actually, I've found that more often than not, the walk-in office tells me to go online to get forms. Not the other way around. > One thing someone else mentioned is paperwork...I think it's essential > that the firm send you paper account statements and trade > confirmations, even if you need to pay a little extra for it. This > whole trend towards electronic statements is a terrible idea, and I > think it's going to lead to a lot of missing records years from now. Agreed on all points. -- Plain Bread alone for e-mail, thanks. The rest gets trashed. No HTML in E-Mail! -- http://www.expita.com/nomime.html Are you posting responses that are easy for others to follow? http://www.greenend.org.uk/rjk/2000/06/14/quoting
| <-- __Chronological__ --> | <-- __Thread__ --> |