Usenet.com

www.Usenet.com

Group Index

Misc Thread Archive from Usenet.com

<-- __Chronological__ --> <-- __Thread__ -->

Re: Last minute tax planning



Elizabeth Richardson wrote:
"John H. Fisher" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote
year, the standard deduction is $4,750 for taxpayers filing as single or
married filing separately, $7,000 for individuals filing as head of
household and $9,500 for taxpayers filing as married filing jointly.

With the fixes to address inequities in the tax law, I find it interesting
that US tax law still gives favorable tax treatment to single parent
households over two parent households. How did this one slip by?

Arguably if it wasn't there, it would be an inequity. Why do we have standard deductions at all? I think the policy behind it that everyone needs a certain amount of money to get by, and the gov't doesn't assess tax on that slice, or some of it anyway (well except Social Security taxes but that's another discussion!). This is kind of the starting point of our progressive tax system, it doesn't start at $0 in income, but at the level of your deductions (an alternative might be doing away with all of these deductions).


That slice is let's say "X" for a single person. It's higher if they are "head of household" because by definition they have more costs to cover than a single person. If someone is married it's not 2X though, because the couple, we hope, lives together, and gains some dollars-in-pocket that have nothing to do with the tax code (car insurance, health insurance, one cable bill) and some that do (spousal IRA). And when we compare a household containing a married couple to a HoH-qualifying household...well I think in most cases the HoH-qualifying individual has a tougher go of it economically - they're supporting the other members of the household, not getting their support. True it allows deduction maximization for an HoH who doesn't marry their roommate, but two people doing that give up the rights and advantages that come with marriage. So maybe they get a bigger deduction, but they pay more in total to insurance, and it somewhat balances out.

I'm not saying that the fine members of our legislature actually think through this kind of stuff but that is at least a policy argument for having things like a "marriage penalty" and a HoH tax schedule that's structured as it is. Fortunately we can leave out of the discussion the issue of whether single parenting is or is not encouraged!

-Tad




<-- __Chronological__ --> <-- __Thread__ -->


Usenet.com



Please check out one of the premium Usenet Newsgroup Service Providers below for access to Usenet.