Re: Canada to Enforce Islamic Law

Go Fig  <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Miguel Cruz) wrote:
>> Charles Farley  <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>> This is a grave, grave mistake.  Not only does Canada refuse to fight
>>> for the basic human right for other peoples to live in freedom, Canada
>>> now willfully embraces tyranny.
>> 
>> Isn't this the same as any situation in which two parties agree to submit
>> to binding arbitration?
>
> I would think not, as the precedents and civil laws are not the same, 
> and then to have the Gov enforce those standards in very alarming.

I don't really understand what you're saying. Here we have two people saying
"we volunteer to have our civil disputes handled in venue X rather than in
the courts" just like when people sign an arbitration clause in a contract.
And just like in arbitration, the standards and "common law" applied may be
different from what's used in the courts.

miguel
-- 
See the world from your web browser: http://travel.u.nu/