Re: Dynamic magnetic field is open

Repeating Decimal <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message news:<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>...
> in article [EMAIL PROTECTED], Sergey
> Karavashkin at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on 11/23/03 3:48 PM:
> 
> > Dear Colleagues,
> > 
> > We published a new paper
> > 
> > " Several experiments studying dynamic magnetic field "
> > 
> > in our journal "SELF Transactions", volume 3 (2003), issue 1
> > 
> > *Abstract*
> > 
> > We substantiate three sets of experiments studying EM induction,
> > describe and present their results. These experiments corroborate that
> > the lines of force of dynamic magnetic field are open, as well as that
> > the phenomenology of process of mutual induction is true if based on
> > the direct interaction of parallel sections of primary and secondary
> > loops. Additional theoretical calculations on the basis of this
> > phenomenology well coincide with the experimental results.
> > 
> > Presented results will basically change the approach to construing the
> > transformers, especially matching.
> > 
> > Please enjoy reading full text:
> > 
> > http://angelfire.lycos.com/la3/selftrans/v3_1/contents3.html#b
> > 
> > I hope, it will be interesting for many of you, and look forward to
> > hear your opinion.
> > 
> > You are welcomed to join us in developing this new technology.
> > 
> > Sergey Karavashkin
> > 
> > Head Laboratory SELF
> > http://angelfire.lycos.com/la3/SELFlab/index.html
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 
> While my almost non-existent Russian means that Sergey Karavashkin's English
> is orders of magnitude better than my Russian, reading the paper is very
> difficult. I would suggest that he get an expert in English to edit the
> paper and republish. The topic sounds interesting.
> 
> I remember some of the old Soviet era days when I was still working, I would
> read AIP translations of Soviet technical journals. They were terrible! In
> particular, I still remember a terg "bathychromic."  After much questioning
> and searching, I concluded that it meant "toward the red."
> 
> We Americans, including me, do tend to be language arrogant. I wish I
> understood other languages, but I was never willing to work hard enough at
> it.
> 
> Bill

Bill, I understand that our English is poor; I can tell you, a year
ago it was much worse. ;-) I'm taking it into account, and one of
trends are clear figures and diagrams. Thank you for your interest in
our results. What can i do they to be more clear to you?

Kind regards,

Sergey.