Re: Unregistered companies

Hello ,



The primary poster indicated he has been working in IT for the past 8
years in small companies. In India addresses and telephone numbers keep
changing very frequently and the letter heads are not updated in sync.
So the contact details on letter heads might not show the current , in
that case a current business card would compensate for that so ACS can
call them for verification.



Getting business cards from previous employers can be daunting for
various reasons like company might not even exist now. But if you think
you can get it, I think you should definetely try to send business cards
with the current contact details.



 (I even had my picture on the company brochure, so I circled it and
 made a note "hey look!!!..iam in here!!...LOL)



All the Best!!!



Cheers,

RJ





Originally posted by skbn136app 

> Hello,

>

> I am from India too and my assessment involved showing experience from
> more than 8 years of which 2.5 years was overseas experience. The
> process of getting Experiences Certificates from companies in which
> you worked around 10 years back is quiet tough and time consuming. I
> am living in UAE and getting addresses and new phone numbers of
> companies in India was indeed very tough. Now if one says that whether
> you worked in small or big company doesnt matters at all. As long as
> your experience was skilled and verifiable you are through. I have
> requested my ex-employers (One of them is a very small company with
> size of 5 staff only) to verify my experience when they call them and
> he has promised me to do the same. Secondly, who is going to retain
> their salary slips, brochures. Once you leave the company you look
> ahead and not think of doing collection of salary slips etc.

>

> My case should be simple as UAE experience of 2.6 years should be very
> easily verifiable as it is a 9001 and 14001 company and the company is
> of repute. I dont think that for just 6 months DIMIA would be calling
> my employers in India. If they call, and the concerned person is not
> there then I think that case get delayed but not rejected.

>

> Regards

>

skbn136app 


-- 
Posted via http://britishexpats.com