Re: SOS;cortico-striato-spinal degeneration

firechief wrote:

> "Nico Kadel-Garcia" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
> news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>
> > Bingo. Forward complaints to [EMAIL PROTECTED], they don't permit this
> > sort of panhandling.
>
>
>
> Path:
> news1.west.cox.net!west.cox.net!east.cox.net!peer02.cox.net!cox.net!pd2nf1so
> .cg.shawcable.net!residential.shaw.ca!news-out.superfeed.net!propagator2-max
> im!news-in-maxim.spamkiller.net!xmission!news-hog.berkeley.edu!ucberkeley!ne
> wsfeed.stanford.edu!postnews1.google.com!not-for-mail
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Xiang BR)
> Newsgroups:
> misc.health.therapy.occupational,misc.health.alternative,misc.health.inferti
> lity,misc.health.diabetes,misc.health.arthritis
> Subject: SOS;cortico-striato-spinal degeneration
> Date: 16 Sep 2003 03:22:14 -0700
> Organization: http://groups.google.com/
> Lines: 10
> Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> NNTP-Posting-Host: 202.102.3.9
>
>
>  Both  163.com  and  202.102.3.9  are registered in communist red china.

And you proceeded to snip out the important bit: don't do that. The key 
to nailing financial fraud spammers is to nail where the money goes, 
which in this case was "[EMAIL PROTECTED]". Yes, it's in China, but 
it's a yahoo.com account in China. [EMAIL PROTECTED] gets the complaint 
since they know whom to send it to and read English, although 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] would probably work, too.

Folks? Clipping out the three lines of content from a spam makes your 
analysis more abstract and really doesn't help prevent the spam from 
having worked. It's better to leave it in so people know what the heck 
you're talking about, even if the original spam has expired.