Re: ~MOTHERS Protect Your Children~

In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
Organic Living <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>Dear Mr Wright..
>
>Or should I say.. Mr Wrong..

How original.  How amusing.  How puerile.

>Firstly, we don't use an email address for posting, because bots pick
>it up and add it to various mailing list.  I think everyone knows
>this.  Secondly if you read the whole document you would have found
>contact details.  And thirdly.. Your OPINION is welcome but 
>it is just that an Opinion and an un-informed one at that.

On the contrary, it's an informed opinion. I actually went to the
trouble of looking up the MSDS for the various compounds.  You, on the
other hand, simply regurgitate MLM propaganda.

>> But it's the usual set of lies about propylene glycol, SLS and SLES.
>> Carefully worded to make them sound just awful.  I could make water
>> sound awful if I were as inventive as these jerks.  (Which I actually
>> am, but it's not worth the effort.)
>
>Again your uniformed opinion.  Peoples health is worth the effort to correct
>your gibberish.

My informed opinion.  And pardon me, spammer, if I don't see you as
the selfless angel you see in yourself.

>Not quite.. 1. Contact details were included.  And these are NOT lies.
>Unless Material Safety Data sheets Lie?  These are industry records not our
>own make believe.. This posted was posted to appropriate groups of interest.
>So you don't see it as an important issue. Well many Including myself, do.
>Again your misinformed opinion..

Yeah, but unlike you, I actually read them.  Which informed me that
the substances you so revile are, in fact, not the health hazards you
paint them to be.  If they were, I'd have stopped using them myself.

>> >DID YOU KNOW? In 1901 cancer was considered a rare disease. Statistics
>> >show that 1 out of 1000 developed some form of cancer. Today, according
>> >to the American Cancer Society, 1 out of 4 people develop some form of
>> >cancer requiring medical intervention.
>>
>> That's because cancer is primarily a disease of older people.  In
>> 1901, life expectancy at birth was 47.
>
>Statistical Rubbish.  You believe anything you are fed.  

That's very humorous, coming from an MLM regurgitator like yourself.
What I said was true.

Also, the recording of health statistics was nowhere near as good in
1901 as it is today.

>Go look into it
>yourself.  Like you say, anything can be presented in a negative fashion.
>Just like these statistics often touted by the Pharma/Medico industry.  The
>statistical error comes from the fact that pre the Surgical Revolution over
>the last 100 years There was a 1in7 chance of Infant Death at Birth and
>another 1 in 7 chance of the Mother dying during birth.  So we had 1 in 4.5
>people dying at the average age of 10yr old.  A huge statistical flaw when
>making claims that We all get cancer now because were all getting older.
>What rubbish. How many young men, women and children are dying of this
>epidemic.  Go do some real research, everyone knows the party line already..
>Nothing new there. Although it keeps people from asking what the biggest
>killer is in the western world?

Heart disease.  Next question?


>> >TOOTHPASTE containing Fluoride is poisonous!
>>
>> That's why you're not supposed to swallow it, a precaution that anyone
>> over the age of 7 should be able to handle just fine.
>
>Just like cigarettes, every does of this crap puts load on your immune
>system.

It does, eh?  What does fluoride that you don't even swallow do to
your immune system?

>THE Proof is in the results people get when they make this life style
>change.  Argue  all you want, Ill take my knowledge from Nature and the
>results I see.  Its clear you didn't even read the whole thing.  The
>fertility issue is extremely relevant and I have seen this method save a lot
>of people pain and heart ache.

I didn't comment on the fertility issue.  Go complain to the people
who did.

>You like to you are "Almost Always correct.." geez gimme a break..  have a
>nice life.. It will probably be a short one.

Nope.  Good genes.  Barring accident, it would not be surprising if I
lived to be at least 90.

  -- David Wright :: alphabeta at prodigy.net 
     These are my opinions only, but they're almost always correct.
       "If I have not seen as far as others, it is because giants
           were standing on my shoulders."  (Hal Abelson, MIT)