Re: ~MOTHERS Protect Your Children~

 

"Organic Living" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...

Re: your barmicidal post..

 

The info you found below may sound ok to you.. But you might want to get your head around the fact that many products now have to lists ingredients in personal care items from highest content, to lowest content. Both these ingredients are found in a range of products. You will usually find SLS in the top 3. (Both forms are still widely used..

 

First, stop posting in HTML.

 

Second, prove that both are used, that the amount used is of a doseage which can be toxic.

 

 

Like you say.. yes One is "clearly" MORE Toxic than the other.. Check next time your at the supermakret and see..) Secondly.. the chemicals are the same in the fact that one is prepared from the other.. 

 

No, that is NOT true, as the studies I posted clearly show. they are NOT chemically the same. The only thing that is similar is the names, and, that is what lying spammers, like yourself, are relying on to shill for their lying companies.

 

What you are doing is propagating an urban legend:

 

http://www.snopes.com/toxins/shampoo.htm

 

 

Thirdly one of the biggest issues with these surfactants is a thing called synergy.. You can, if you feel so inclined look further into it.  In respect of brevity that one paragraph was enough to prompt someone to investigate for themselves.  I would not be recomending that anyone continue this lab study on their children. Especially new born babies.

 

Talk about scaremongering.

 

And lastly.. you have to be severely intellectually challenged by taking chemistry research data that has more than a 20year Old Date!  You should have thrown in the Chemical report that said chemicals cannot penetrate the skin while you were at it.. Or those the early J.A.M.A. Studies that said Smoking did not cause cancer? Or that Mercury in baby teething gels was safe!

 

Can you point out where it has changed? I took the data from the NIH ToxNET website. It is the premier source for toxicology information.

 

You also might want to consider the ethics of companies that have "Not Tested On Animals" labels on products that contain these cocktails of toxic chemicals that were tested on animals too.  But I am sure that wouldn't bother you..  But maybe others..

 

G-d put animals on earth so man could use them.

 

So please forgive me Mr Probertios for trying to help educate people about these issues as well as providing the same solution I use for myself and my family.

 

I never forgive lying MLM scammers.

 

Solutions that have been a major part of successful infertility treatment, that the J.AMA has not even given 1 column centimetre of space to promote. 

 

JAMA does not promote anything that does not past rigorous testing. Obviously, yours flunked.

 

Wouldn't want to jeopardise all that money that pours into the industry from IVF treatment.  Expensive isn't it!  Who would have thought that going on an organic diet (Free from toxic pesticides and other nasties) coupled with detoxing your body and home would have better results than the leading fertility treatments. And for litteral pennies in comparison.

 

Another detoxer! I just love you detoxers.

 

Hows the saying go..?

 

All truth passes through 3 stages..First it is ridiculed.. Then it is violently opposed, then it is accepted as if it was known all along..

 

I am sorry to see you at stage 1.

 

If I were you, I would be more worried about DiHydrogen Monoxide. It is a proven dangerous substance, and is found worldwide. The fact that it is all natural is no protectant. In fact, the discoverer of the danger of this chemical substance won a science fair!

 

Dihydrogen monoxide is colorless, odorless, tasteless, and kills uncounted thousands of people every year. Most of these deaths are caused by accidental inhalation of DHMO, but the dangers of dihydrogen monoxide do not end there. Prolonged exposure to its solid form causes severe tissue damage. Symptoms of DHMO ingestion can include excessive sweating and urination, and possibly a bloated feeling, nausea, vomiting and body electrolyte imbalance. For those who have become dependent, DHMO withdrawal means certain death.

Dihydrogen monoxide:

• is also known as hydroxl acid, and is the major component of acid rain.
• contributes to the "greenhouse effect."
• may cause severe burns.
• contributes to the erosion of our natural landscape.
• accelerates corrosion and rusting of many metals.
• may cause electrical failures and decreased effectiveness of automobile brakes.
• has been found in excised tumors of terminal cancer patients.

Contamination is reaching epidemic proportions!

Quantities of dihydrogen monoxide have been found in almost every stream, lake, and reservoir in America today. But the pollution is global, and the contaminant has even been found in Antarctic ice. DHMO has caused millions of dollars of property damage in the midwest, and recently California.

Despite the danger, dihydrogen monoxide is often used:

• as an industrial solvent and coolant.
• in nuclear power plants.
• in the production of styrofoam.
• as a fire retardant.
• in many forms of cruel animal research.
• in the distribution of pesticides. Even after washing, produce remains contaminated by this chemical.
• as an additive in certain "junk-foods" and other food products.

Companies dump waste DHMO into rivers and the ocean, and nothing can be done to stop them because this practice is still legal. The impact on wildlife is extreme, and we cannot afford to ignore it any longer!

The American government has refused to ban the production, distribution, or use of this damaging chemical due to its "importance to the economic health of this nation." In fact, the navy and other military organizations are conducting experiments with DHMO, and designing multi-billion dollar devices to control and utilize it during warfare situations. Hundreds of military research facilities receive tons of it through a highly sophisticated underground distribution network. Many store large quantities for later use.