Re: ~MOTHERS Protect Your Children~

Dear Mr Wright..

Or should I say.. Mr Wrong.. Firstly, we don't use an email address for
posting, because bots pick it up and add it to various mailing list.  I
think everyone knows this.  Secondly if you read the whole document you
would have found contact details.  And thirdly.. Your OPINION is welcome but
it is just that an Opinion and an un-informed one at that.

> But it's the usual set of lies about propylene glycol, SLS and SLES.
> Carefully worded to make them sound just awful.  I could make water
> sound awful if I were as inventive as these jerks.  (Which I actually
> am, but it's not worth the effort.)

Again your uniformed opinion.  Peoples health is worth the effort to correct
your gibberish.

> >I URGE YOU..
> >
> >DO NOT JUST ACCEPT IT. Investigate it yourself!
>
> Yep.  And if you'll do, you'll discover that the anonymous poster
> (don't you love spammers who use anti-spam precautions?) is lying
> his or her ass off.

Not quite.. 1. Contact details were included.  And these are NOT lies.
Unless Material Safety Data sheets Lie?  These are industry records not our
own make believe.. This posted was posted to appropriate groups of interest.
So you don't see it as an important issue. Well many Including myself, do.
Again your misinformed opinion..

> >DID YOU KNOW? In 1901 cancer was considered a rare disease. Statistics
> >show that 1 out of 1000 developed some form of cancer. Today, according
> >to the American Cancer Society, 1 out of 4 people develop some form of
> >cancer requiring medical intervention.
>
> That's because cancer is primarily a disease of older people.  In
> 1901, life expectancy at birth as 47.

Statistical Rubbish.  You believe anything you are fed.  Go look into it
yourself.  Like you say, anything can be presented in a negative fashion.
Just like these statistics often touted by the Pharma/Medico industry.  The
statistical error comes from the fact that pre the Surgical Revolution over
the last 100 years There was a 1in7 chance of Infant Death at Birth and
another 1 in 7 chance of the Mother dying during birth.  So we had 1 in 4.5
people dying at the average age of 10yr old.  A huge statistical flaw when
making claims that We all get cancer now because were all getting older.
What rubbish. How many young men, women and children are dying of this
epidemic.  Go do some real research, everyone knows the party line already..
Nothing new there. Although it keeps people from asking what the biggest
killer is in the western world?

Do you know the answer Mr Wright?

> >TOOTHPASTE containing Fluoride is poisonous!
>
> That's why you're not supposed to swallow it, a precaution that anyone
> over the age of 7 should be able to handle just fine.

Just like cigarettes, every does of this crap puts load on your immune
system.  Add that to every other piece of garbage you put into your body via
skin, air and mouth, and the chemical cocktail adds up..  many of these
chemicals stay in your system for weeks on end. Everyday you apply more and
more.  And what about people with chemical sensitivities.. Your ignorance
and arrogance astounds me..

THE Proof is in the results people get when they make this life style
change.  Argue  all you want, Ill take my knowledge from Nature and the
results I see.  Its clear you didn't even read the whole thing.  The
fertility issue is extremely relevant and I have seen this method save a lot
of people pain and heart ache.

>   -- David Wright :: alphabeta at prodigy.net
>      These are my opinions only, but they're almost always correct.
>        "If I have not seen as far as others, it is because giants
>            were standing on my shoulders."  (Hal Abelson, MIT)

You like to you are "Almost Always correct.." geez gimme a break..  have a
nice life.. It will probably be a short one.