Re: the Danish study on vaccines and autishm

"Heather James" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

> Sure, if I wanted to bother to look things up for you.

So sayeth a blatherer who wil not back up her ASSertions. Your credibility
bubble just burst.

It's something I've
> read in the last few months, and is probably on my hard drive.

Then it should not be hard for you to find it. Of course, that is, if it
exists.

However, I
> have noticed that you have two priorities on this list:  running down Jan
> Drew, whoever that is,

Jan Drew is an evil person who violates the tenets of civilized behavior,
whines to ISPs and employers, closes down people's email accounts, supports
anti-semitism, anti-Catholicsm, and is a homophobe.

and running down any sort of alternative healing
> method that anyone is trying to discuss.

You mean like asking for some proof, other than testimonials, that it works?
Sure do.

I don't know what you are doing
> on an alternative health list.

Providing a reality check for the woefully uninformed and to prevent the
gullible from being taken advantage of.

> It is obvious that you have no use for
> anything that doesn't come from doctors and governemnt.

Au contraire! You have not read my brilliant defense of eating RealFood over
the push to shove chemically laden supplements down the lazy eaters'
throats.

> Markiosos2 Probertiosos2 wrote:
>
> > Can you provide a scintilla of proof of your claims? There are
thimerosal
> > free vaccines available for every childhood immunization except on,
IIRC.
> >
> >
> >
> > "Heather James" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
> > news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >> Actually, while the feds have mandated the removal of mercury from
> >> children's vaccines, the vaccine companies have not, in many cases,
done
> > so
> >> as yet.  The feds just keep giving extensions & exemptions, while the
> >> kids continue to be poisoned.
> >>
> >> soft-eng wrote:
> >>
> >> > [EMAIL PROTECTED] (David Wright) wrote in message
> >> > news:<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>...
> >> >> In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
> >> >> soft-eng <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >> >> >[EMAIL PROTECTED] (David Wright) wrote in message
> >> >> >news:<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>...
> >> >> >
> >> >> >> The problem with your rather flamboyant assertion is that mercury
> >> >> >> toxicity is also a cumulative thing.  If you get hundreds of
times
> >> >> >> the recommended amount *every day*, that's different from getting
> >> >> >> a bunch one day and then nothing for a long time.
> >> >> >
> >> >> >So would you be willing to eat 180 times the toxic level
> >> >> >of mercury one day, and not eat any more mercury for
> >> >> >a very long time, and let us know how well it worked out?
> >> >>
> >> >> Hard to say.  But since vaccines for children no longer contain
> >> >> mercury anyway, the whole point is moot, is it not?
> >> >
> >> > Not really, the point here was to try to help those
> >> > who were hurt during a whole decade.  (That's a lot
> >> > of children.)
> >> >
> >> > The medical establishment basically says things
> >> > like (a) increased detection, that just happened
> >> > to coincide with this era.  This will be clear
> >> > with time, but those who were hurt aren't necessarily
> >> > served best by waiting.  (b) mercury is not a poison
> >> > when given within the established framework.
> >> > This is essentially dishonest hogwash, and reduces
> >> > the belief-level in the explanation a), which can
> >> > be assumed to have been produced by similar
> >> > dishonest motivations.
> >> >
> >> > There are some researchers working on this
> >> > angle (anybody interested please google for "DAN"),
> >> > but the level of research has been much limited
> >> > than is required.
> >> >
> >> > Since sufficient research is not available,
> >> > it's up to us to pass any useful folk-remedies
> >> > around anecdotally (while keeping the
> >> > scammers at bay somehow... Probably not
> >> > entirely possible.)
> >> >
> >> > [Personal note to anybody interested:  I felt DAN's
> >> > chelation-medication may have been strong on side-effects, and
> >> > also their rates of recovery was not too
> >> > promising for the 5-and-older group.  I found a reference
> >> > to the Japanese discovery on Cilantro, and wanted
> >> > to give it a try first, since many mercury-affected
> >> > adults had provided testimony on the net
> >> > that it worked for them.  In my particular situation, it
> >> > worked well-enough that I didn't need to recourse
> >> > to the stronger medication.  But all cases
> >> > may be different.  DAN did have good results
> >> > for younger patients.]
> >>
>