
www.Usenet.com
| <-- __Chronological__ --> | <-- __Thread__ --> |
"Todd Gastaldo" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >WORKERS' COMP FOR BIRTH INJURIES... Virginia ACOG's Willett LeHew, MD and >TRIGON/ANTHEM (Snead/Glasscock), please see the postscripts below. > >RELAXIN... > >STEVE YEOMANS, DC says: > >"Relaxin primarily affects the joints in the pelvis, softening them and >preparing them for stretching during childbirth..." >http://www.yeomansdc.com/patient_info/pregnancy.html > >OPEN LETTER (archived for global access: >http://health.groups.yahoo.com/group/chiro-list/message/2260) > >Steve Yeomans, DC >404 Eureka Street >Ripon, WI 54971-0263 >Phone (920) 748-3644 >Fax (920) 748-3642 >(via Mark S. Edinger [EMAIL PROTECTED]) > >Steve, > >The most common delivery positions - semisitting and dorsal - are >"ANTI-Relaxin" in a sense. > >Semisitting and dorsal are "woman-on-her-back/butt" delivery positions. > >Semisitting and dorsal delivery positions place the woman on her sacrum >thereby closing her birth canal (up to 30%) thereby PREVENTING the joints in >the pelvis from stretching during childbirth... > >CHIROPRACTIC EMERGENCY: In addition to routinely closing birth canals up to >30%, MDs often GRUESOMELY manipulate babies' spines (push with oxytocin; >pull with forceps/vacuums) with the birth canal senselessly closed up to >30%. > >An estimated six babies per day DIE from vacuum-assisted spinal manipulation >alone - with birth canals senselessly closed up to 30%. > >For documentation of this latter fact - and for details on how EASY it is >for pregnant women to allow their birth canals to OPEN the "extra" up to >30%... > >See How NOT to do McRoberts maneuver... >http://health.groups.yahoo.com/group/chiro-list/message/2258 > >Steve, I urge you to add this CHIROPRACTIC EMERGENCY to your Pregnancy page. > >INFORM pregnant women: MDs are senselessly closing birth canals and >gruesomely (sometimes fatally) manipulating most babies' spines at birth. > >Pregnant women must be informed how EASY it is for them to allow their birth >canals to OPEN the "extra" up to 30%. > >See again: How NOT to do McRoberts maneuver, URL above. > >Thanks for reading, > >Sincerely, > >Todd > >Dr. Gastaldo >[EMAIL PROTECTED] > >PS1 Steve Yeomans, Workers' Compensation and Birth Injuries... > >Sig Miller, Chiropractic Gateway Moderator www.chiropracticgateway.com says, > >"Steve Yeomans, DC...teaches the many special documentation considerations >for worker's compensation cases....Wed - 12/3 @ 1pm EST Dial 512.225.3351, >access code 993351#" > >Steve, why not inform your Wed - 12/3 class that in Virginia some birth >injuries are now being handled administratively through Workers' >Compensation, as in, > >"Qualifying births are handled administratively through >the Virginia Workers' Compensation Commission." >http://www.vabirthinjury.com/obgyn_physicians2.htm > >Currently, children in Virginia's Birth-Injury Program are said to "fare >better than children receiving a tort remedy" > >I think part of the reason the Workers' Compensation Commission >administrative remedy is yielding more money for birth-injured babies than >malpractice lawsuits is that juries aren't yet being told that MDs are >negligently closing birth canals and gruesomely manipulating most babies' >spines. > > >See Rule 302, Birth and Trigon/Anthem (Glasscock) - and ACOG's Willett >LeHew, MD >http://health.groups.yahoo.com/group/chiro-list/message/2252 > > >PS2 Steve, you allude to the fact that NSAIDS should be avoided during >pregnancy, as in, > >"Chiropractic Care for Low Back Pain in Pregnancy? You bet!...Chiropractic >care is one of the best things that can be done to relieve the expectant >mother's pain...[D]rugs...can be harmful to her unborn child and [are] thus >contraindicated during pregnancy." >http://www.yeomansdc.com/patient_info/pregnancy.html > >ACOG's Willett LeHew, MD (mentioned above) was one of the Virginia >physicians on the Managed Care Advisory Panel that advised Trigon (now >Anthem) to REWRITE the AHCPR-sponsored Acute Low Back Problems Guideline and >DELETE chiropractic-style manipulation. > >Since Trigon (now Anthem) distributed the new guideline to many Virginia >MDs, many Virginia MDs are likely recommending NSAIDS without mentioning the >option of chiropractic-style manipulation. > >I know personally of one woman who during her pregnancy had low back pain >and had NSAIDS prescribed. Before taking any, she did some research and >wound up telling her MD that pregnant women should avoid NSAIDS... > >Since pregnant women should indeed avoid NSAIDS, I'm hoping ACOG's Willett >LeHew, MD will personally act to get the chiropractic-style manipulation >option into the Trigon (now Anthem) guideline... > >Quite simply, as the obstetrician on Trigon's panel Willett knew better (or >SHOULD have known better) than to deny pregnant women the non-drug >chiropractic-style spinal manipulation option. > >Obstetrician Willett's PRIORITY of course should be to STOP the >GRUESOME-style spinal manipulation of MD-obstetricians - by simply stopping >them from senselessly closing birth canals. > >I'll cc Willett again via the Virginia birth-injury program >([EMAIL PROTECTED] et al). Willett has not yet responded. Nor has >the Virginia birth-injury program responded - not even to say that my email >has been forwarded to Willett. > >ATTENTION Virginia MD-obstetricians: You are unnecessarily harming babies >and sending some to the Virginia Workers' Compensation Commission...You are >unnecessarily draining money from the system to pay for your obvious >negligence. > >AN OBSTETRICIAN BOONDOGGLE... > >Part of the "ad" for Virginia's no-fault birth injury program... > >"No Expensive & Time Consuming Court Case - Through this unique program, >should a qualifying birth-injury occur, you would not face an expensive and >possibly difficult court case. You also do not have to spend hours or days >out of the office. Qualifying births are handled administratively through >the Virginia Workers' Compensation Commission....When you participate, you >are entitled by law to a malpractice coverage credit from your insurance >company. This credit varies by each insurance carrier, however, in many >cases it covers most or all of the cost of participating in the Birth-Injury >Program...As a no-fault program, qualifying events are not reported to the >National Practitioner Database." >http://www.vabirthinjury.com/obgyn_physicians2.htm > >MD-obstetricians: If you must push or pull - and sometimes you must - FIRST >get women off their backs/butts. During delivery, women should not be made >to close their birth canals up to 30%. > >Final note: One of the most important lessons learned at chiropractic >college is when NOT to manipulate the spine. The most prolific spinal >manipulators - MD-obstetricians - should NOT be manipulating tiny spines >with birth canals closed. > >Again, thanks for reading, > >Sincerely, > >Todd > >Dr. Gastaldo >[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > >***As indicated above, this post will be archived for global access at: >http://health.groups.yahoo.com/group/chiro-list/message/2260 > >Within 24 hours, this post will be in the Google archive. Search >http://groups.google.com for MDs - "'Anti-Relaxin' (Attn Dr. Yeomans)" >concatenated > ----== Posted via Usenet.Com - Unlimited-Uncensored-Secure Usenet News==---- http://www.Usenet.com The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! >100,000 Newsgroups ---= 19 East/West-Coast Specialized Servers - Total Privacy via Encryption =---
| <-- __Chronological__ --> | <-- __Thread__ --> |