
www.Usenet.com
| <-- __Chronological__ --> | <-- __Thread__ --> |
I am inclined to agree with you but as the article implies that the genetic makeup of a Brit is immune to heterosexual AIDS maybe it's just all HIV positive homosexual immigrants who should be prevented from entering. (no pun intented :) "Poop Dogg" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> a écrit dans le message de news:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > "LeftBank" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message... > > I quote from the same article > > > > "There were 1,850 cases of HIV diagnosed during 2002 that were likely to > > have been acquired in the UK. " > > > > So, as I understand it, out of the 5711 HIV cases announced around 4000 > > were from immigrants. I have reread this article to see if I'm not following > > something but no, I cannot see that to say anything other than there were > > 1850 new HIV diagnoses amongst UK citizens. > > If the above numbers are true then the UK is foolish to allow immigrants > in without testing them for HIV (and other diseases). I am anticipating > the development of an instant saliva dip stick test so that Western > nations can test all foreigners entering their countries. Furthermore, > how many of the 1,850 cases "likely acquired in the UK" were contracted > from HIV+ immigrants? During the recent SARS outbreak, nations around > the world set up screening systems to detect possible carriers attempting > to enter their countries; why shouldn't people be screened for HIV too? > >
| <-- __Chronological__ --> | <-- __Thread__ --> |