
www.Usenet.com
| <-- __Chronological__ --> | <-- __Thread__ --> |
On Sun, 30 Nov 2003 17:22:58 GMT, "Markiosos2 Probertiosos2" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> took a very strange color crayon and scribbled: >The DSSA 2003 is also the subject of scaremongering. Those who are against >it claim that the purpose of the act is to ban dietary supplements, and >point to the section wherein a manufacturer must track adverse event reports >and report them to the FDA. IOW, they must own up to the bad things, unlike >some of the comapnies who are sweeping them under the rug. Well, I'm against it because apparently it would affect my ability to choose vitamin/mineral supplements. Whether that's the same as what you call dietary supplements, I have no idea. I've already seen the FDA yank Zinc Orotate off the market simply because some yahoo company (I think it was in Japan) fouled up their formulation, and it was a very effective formulation when made properly, so I am in no mood for them to f*ck with the remaining vitamin/mineral supplements on the market. -- Therese Shellabarger / The Roving Reporter - Civis Mundi [EMAIL PROTECTED] / http://tlshell.cnc.net/
| <-- __Chronological__ --> | <-- __Thread__ --> |