
www.Usenet.com
| <-- __Chronological__ --> | <-- __Thread__ --> |
"Tom Morley" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message news:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > thewhit wrote: > > David Cohen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message > > news:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > >>"Lucas Buck" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote > >> > >>> "David Cohen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >>> > >>>>"wwhs_fan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote > >>>> > >>>>>I was wanting to know if anybody had any good chest workouts > >> > >>because > >> > >>>>>that is the one area that i can't gain in. > >>>> > >>>>I had a good chest workout today. > >>>> > >>>> > >>>>>Any advice would be > >>>>>helpful > >>>> > >>>>Craps has the best odds if you learn the game well. Blackjack can > >> > >>be > >> > >>>>beaten if you count cards, but getting caught will hurt. > >>> > >>>Is there actually a LAW against counting cards, or only against > >> > >>using mechanical/electronic > >> > >>>devices to assist you in counting cards? > >> > >>No, no law. But the law allows casinos to control who plays in their > >>businesses, except, of course, you can't discriminate against the > >>usual protected classes. People with a mental system to beat the odds > >>are not a protected class. Card counters are identified, info shared > >>with all the casinos, and are then banned forever. With the exception > >>of a few small places that deal from a single deck and shuffle between > >>each deal, which negates card counting. > >> > >>David > > > > > > i have a phd relative who is a math whiz and is on that banned list. > > > > whit > > > > Depending on the rules, of course, the optimum non counting > strategy for blackjack is actually slightly to the player's > advantage. The strategy, though is quite complicated, especially > in the details as to when to split pairs. (And, of course, the > details are important!) > One can, of course, do better by counting, but this is easy to > spot. > she's hella smart. and good with numbers. whit > > > -- > Tom Morley | Same roads > [EMAIL PROTECTED] | Same rights > [EMAIL PROTECTED] | Same rules > AIM: DocTDM >
| <-- __Chronological__ --> | <-- __Thread__ --> |