
www.Usenet.com
| <-- __Chronological__ --> | <-- __Thread__ --> |
Best way to settle this is to call him a "Founding Partner" not a Founder. S Chadha wrote: > I am looking for people's opinion on definition of "Founder" of a company. > > Here is the background: > > I founded a company in May 2002 and hence I was the "founder" of > the company. When I founded the company I had a few employees > as I raised some seed funding. > > In December 2002 a friend joined me. He is a great worker and > contributed in a major way. As we were running out of money, for > a few months he worked for no or little money. > > He finally asked me if he can be a co-founder of the company. > I was OK him to be "co-founder" because of his contributions, however > I do not want to give up my "founder" status. > > Any and all thoughts are appreciated. > > (As entrepreneurs most would understand the importantace of this > intangible satisfaction of being a founder)
| <-- __Chronological__ --> | <-- __Thread__ --> |