Re: Social Darwinism; was: So Long Judge Moore, We'll Miss You

Andrew Glasgow <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message news:<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>...
> In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
>  [EMAIL PROTECTED] (ambrose searle) wrote:
> 
> > My preferred topic is American History. I was drawn into a discussion
> > of Social Darwinism when I made the claim that much of what Darwin
> > wrote has been rejected... which now seems to be the consensus of most
> > of the posters in this thread; but Carol Lee Smith challenged the
> > assertion. Now that everyone else is saying that it's a given, I've
> > made my case.
> 
> Who's saying that?

Who is saying that some of what Darwin wrote is wrong? How about you:

> Some of what Darwin wrote is wrong.