
www.Usenet.com
| <-- __Chronological__ --> | <-- __Thread__ --> |
On Tue, 02 Dec 2003 23:48:17 -0800, "Bill Bonde ( the oblique allusion in lieu of the frontal attack )" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > >Alberto Moreira wrote: >> >> Said "Bill Bonde ( the oblique allusion in lieu of the frontal attack >> )" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> : >> >> >> >We have people who have native dialects. All I'm saying is that it helps >> >the learning process for the instructor to know where the student is >> >coming from. Just calling the student a moron over and over while >> >walloping him on the knuckles with a ruler isn't going to change >> >anything except where he keeps his hands. >> >> Language is about communication and communication goes both ways. If >> I'm not communicating because my accent is too thick or my dialect is >> incomprehensible, the load's on me to make myself understood. Want to >> speak your dialect ? Go speak it to people who understand it, or else >> make a jolly good effort to be understood by the rest of us ! >> >Well, I admit I'm not understanding you. If a student moves to an area that speaks dialect ,he should adjust. but if a teacher moves to an area that speaks dialect "He" should adjust also to the slang . My two cent ! don't try to change the neighborhoods dailect, you may get ran out of town ! > > > >> >Who said *anything* about 'pandering' to anything? You invented that. >> >> Letting a student get away with speaking dialect is pandering, unless >> everyone speaks that dialect - in which case it's a dialect no more. >> >Who is letting the student get away with speaking dialect? All I said >was that the teacher should understand where the student is coming from >so that the teacher can make the best progress possible. > > > >> >You are diverging into other topics here. My original point stands, that >> >the teacher should have a clue *why* the student is making an error so >> >that the teacher can more easily apply the right corrective measures. >> >> The whys are pretty irrelevant to the teacher. It's a simple question >> of common sense: want to be understood ? Be understood. It's up to the >> student, not to the teacher. >> >So if the student doesn't understand something, that's not the teacher's >problem?! > > > >> >Imagine walking into class with an idiolect which had tense as optional >> >and aspect as mandatory, the opposite of the situation in Standard >> >American English. Imagine not having understood that some of your >> >dialect's constructions are camouflaged in meaning compared to near or >> >even identical constructions that the teacher knows in Standard American >> >English. Would you be surprised that you might have trouble? That the >> >teacher might become frustrated? >> >> I have this kind of situation every semester with my Chinese students. >> >I hope you aren't an ESL teacher. > > > >> Yet they must change, and I can't do much about it - so, my class is >> in English, and if they can't handle it, their problem. You know, >> there's nothing like placing some demand on the student's survival >> instinct, it does wonders. >> >Fine, but that doesn't address my original point at all. Al Gore, Ex-Vice President and dumbass liberal !
| <-- __Chronological__ --> | <-- __Thread__ --> |