Re: Price gouging is beneficial. Price gouging is great!

In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [EMAIL PROTECTED] (rex) writes:
<[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Cary Kittrell) wrote in message news:<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>...
<> In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [EMAIL PROTECTED] (rex) writes:
<> <
<>     {...}
<>     
<> <   You have again proved how the cliches of totalitarian socialism are
<> <idiotic, and produce poverty, shortages, misery and the massive
<> <starvation, thirst, killing and deaths that characterized the Union of
<> <Soviet Socialist Republics, Communist China and the National Socialist
<> <German Workers' Party.  And you are too dense to even know it. 
<> <Thanks, it was hilarious to read it.
<> 
<> One thing all of the above had in common was a dreary mind-numbing
<> style of official propaganda, wherein it was obligatory to include
<> phrases like "American imperialism" and "running-dog capitalists"
<> every third sentence or so, lest the text start to display some
<> kind of lively readability.
<> 
<> Your post, which managed to pack fourteen (14) repetitions of 
<> "totalitarian socialism" or "totalitarian socialists" in
<> one short space, was very evocative of such agit-prop.
<> 
<> What is it about idealogues that mandates this turn-the-crank
<> style of exposition?  
<> 
<> 
<> -- cary
<
<Thanks for not disputing that the cliches of totalitarian socialism
<are
<idiotic, and produce poverty, shortages, misery and the massive
<starvation, thirst, killing and deaths that characterized the Union of
<Soviet Socialist Republics, Communist China and the National Socialist
<German Workers' Party.  It was amusing to see that that you did not
<dispute that the cliches of totalitarian socialism are idiotic, and
<produce poverty, shortages, misery and the massive starvation, thirst,
<killing and deaths that characterized the Union of Soviet Socialist
<Republics, Communist China and the National Socialist German Workers'
<Party.  It was amusing because you didn't openly concede it, but you
<did so by not disputing it and by trying to change the subject.  
<That's why I write that way, because it is a way to make socialists
<face their cliches of totalitarian socialism that are idiotic, and
<produce poverty, shortages, misery and the massive starvation, thirst,
<killing and deaths that characterized the Union of Soviet Socialist
<Republics, Communist China and the National Socialist German Workers'
<Party.  And it's also fun to watch socialists constantly evade it as
<it is repeated.  Does that description fit your comments so far?
<Thanks.

I believe your point might have been more forcefully made if
you had thought to bring up the cliches of totalitarian
socialism.  See, that way you would have cleared the way to ... 
oops, hang on ...  My bad; I should read more carefully.

But while we're on the subject, what are the cliches of
totalitarian socialism?


-- cary