Re: Social Darwinism; was: So Long Judge Moore, We'll Miss You

On Tue, 2 Dec 2003 03:12:43 +0000 (UTC), [EMAIL PROTECTED] (ambrose
searle) wrote:

[Lost post . . . sorry for the duplication should the original find its way
home wagging its tail behind it] 

>Bob LeChevalier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message news:<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>...
>> catshark <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> >>The "support" I
>> >>look to are credentialled scholars who publish in academic presses on
>> >>these issues. I think their views are far more significant that those
>> >>of zealous usenet hacks who are only about an inch deep.
>> >
>> >Hah!  Fooled ya!  I hadn't replaced that irony meter yet!
>> 
>> He probably doesn't realize that many of the posters on matters
>> evolutionary on talk.origins are precisely credentialed scholars who
>> publish in academic presses on these issues,
>
>Are these the same fellows who are now engaging in imbecilic conflicts
>with each other in talk.origins because of unpaid illegal gambling
>debts?

Tsk, tsk, Ambrose . . . whatever made you think all bets are illegal
gambling? 

Wouldn't be making unjustified generalizations now, would you . . . ?

Anyway, that's us!  

It has its charms once you get use to it.  For one thing, you can skip
200-300 posts like those (or, believe it or not, worse) a day and still
find as many interesting ones.  And on any given day you can find any
number of really informative posts by real experts on subjects not easy to
just stumble across that can truly teach you something you might never
otherwise learn.   

It's all a wheat/chaff thing . . .

---------------
J. Pieret
---------------

Cogito sum, ergo sum, cogito.

                - Robert Carroll -