
www.Usenet.com
| <-- __Chronological__ --> | <-- __Thread__ --> |
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (rex) wrote:
>Bob LeChevalier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message news:<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>...
>> >do not know all the horrible ideologies that have used that same response.
>>
>> I don't much care what horrid ideologies have "used that same
>> response". I am sure that horrid ideologies have claimed that 2+2=4,
>> but your argument would demand a different answer because one cannot
>> say something that a horrid ideology also says.
>>
>> How trite.
>
>We all realize that you don't much care that horrid ideologies have
>"used that same response". We all realize that you are sure what
>horrid ideologies have claimed.
Actually I don't know or care what horrid ideologies have claimed,
since I reject all ideologies, horrid or not.
>And your argument demands the same
>answer because one should not say something that a horrid ideology
>also says.
Your moral position ("should") is totally uninteresting to me. I say
what I say regardless of what others, horrid or otherwise say.
But of course, I consider your ideology as horrid as theirs.
>> >Very frightening.
>>
>> Your ilk certainly would be, if more than a couple percent of the
>> population didn't think you were full of shit.
>
>Your ilk certainly would be, if more than a couple percent of the
>population didn't think you were full of shit. That is why you
>advocate government violence and government coercion, because no one
>will voluntarily do what you wish.
Unfortunately for your bullshit, they generally do.
>> >You can point to nothing.
>>
>> Why should I. I think for myself, rather than letting Ayn Rand and
>> company think for me.
>
>You don't think for yourself, you let the former Union of Soviet
>Socialist Republics, Communist China, and the National Socialist
>German Workers' Party, Marx, Stalin, Bismarck, Mao etc., and company
>think for you.
Nope. And your repeating such nonsense won't make it so.
lojbab
--
lojbab [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bob LeChevalier, Founder, The Logical Language Group
(Opinions are my own; I do not speak for the organization.)
Artificial language Loglan/Lojban: http://www.lojban.org
| <-- __Chronological__ --> | <-- __Thread__ --> |