
www.Usenet.com
| <-- __Chronological__ --> | <-- __Thread__ --> |
Capitalist Pig <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >On Mon, 01 Dec 2003 13:43:46 -0500, Bob LeChevalier ><[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >>Absolutely. My emotions render me superior to a machine. > >Isn't it funny the Universe had to wait billions of years to reach a >stage where biological machines would be able to think clearly about >itself, for those machines to decide to act like any other animal >instead? Human beings cannot think clearly about themselves. They are biased by self-interest. >>"Reason" as in "philosophy" is totally dependent on the quality of the >>axioms. Those who argue it typically choose axioms based on whether >>they support the results that the person wants. Reject those axioms, >>and you may end up with the opposite conclusion. > >The principle I start with, and one I am not willing to reject, is >that individuals own themselves. I don't accept that axiom, and indeed find it morally questionable that the concept of ownership should apply to human beings at all. Hence your philosophy is utterly worthless to me. >Based on this principle, it's not >difficult to conclude that price gouging is not immoral and should be >illegal. I agree that it should be illegal (or taxed 100%, which would accomplish the same purpose and reduce the deficit), but I suspect that you misstated. lojbab -- lojbab [EMAIL PROTECTED] Bob LeChevalier, Founder, The Logical Language Group (Opinions are my own; I do not speak for the organization.) Artificial language Loglan/Lojban: http://www.lojban.org
| <-- __Chronological__ --> | <-- __Thread__ --> |