Re: Social Darwinism; was: So Long Judge Moore, We'll Miss You

[EMAIL PROTECTED] (ambrose searle) wrote:
>> Furthermore Darwin held no
>> theory of Social Darwinism for the simple reason that it is not a
>> scientific theory, 
>
>Do you realize how ridiculous what you just wrote is? You think that
>only scientific theories can be theories!!??

To scientists, any other thing labeled a "theory" is a misuse of the
word.

lojbab
-- 
lojbab                                             [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bob LeChevalier, Founder, The Logical Language Group
(Opinions are my own; I do not speak for the organization.)
Artificial language Loglan/Lojban:                 http://www.lojban.org