Re: So Long Judge Moore, We'll Miss You

Carol Lee Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message news:<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>...
> On 22 Nov 2003, ambrose searle wrote:
> 
> >
> > All with impeccable credentials.
> 
> There are credentials and then again there are credentials.

All the scientists I identified have solid academic credentials and
reputable academic positions. If they were what you imply, they would
neither be able to publish in academic presses nor maintain academic
appointments.

> > Wells, Denton, et al have refuted some of the more basic tenets of
> > Darwinism.
> 
> What would those "more basic 'tenets'" be?

natural selection, etc.

> And FYI, "tenets" is a might strange word to use when speaking about
> science.

It applies quite well in this case.

> > > > By the way, which scientist confirmed Darwin's theory of Social
> > > > Darwinism?
>  
> > > Please put Darwin's theory of Social Darwinism 
>  
> > > here ---------->
>  
> > http://human-nature.com/rmyoung/papers/paper60h.html
> 
> What kind of a scientist is Robert M. Young?

Take a look: http://human-nature.com/rmyoung/cv.html

> > > > > Not inherently, but religious philosophy usually crosses into
> > > > > "theology" and is called by that label.
>  
> > > > Philosophy does not specialize in atheism. Period.
>  
> > > Did anyone say it did?
>  
> > Yes. Bob LeChevalier:
>  
> > A.S."I majored in philosophy"
>  
> > B.L."So you chose a major that specializes in atheism"
>  
> > http://groups.google.com/groups?selm=g7nsqvs6pkmvdo56chbta907ue51q6hj6d%404ax.com&output
>  
> > Any other questions?
> 
> Have you ever posted this kind of stuff in talk.origins before this?

proof that bob said philosophy specializes in atheism?

No.