Re: So Long Judge Moore, We'll Miss You

[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in message news:<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>...
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] (ambrose searle) wrote:
> 
> >:|[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in message news:<
> >:|
> >:|Ah, let's see if Buckeye Allison is able to get away from his typical
> >:|ad hominem, stalking, making it personal... "let's prove the real
> >:|identity of a poster," etc. ad nauseum...

Perhaps he'll get beyond poster's identity yet...

> Only one poster, one poster who wanted to be "discovered," or who is unable
> to change his own habits.

Not yet...

> Only one poster who brought his very easily recognizable M.O. and bag of
> topics with him from 3/99 to 9/00 when he reappeared in 2002 and again this
> year. 

Nope, not yet.

> Only difference was the name. It got transformed from R.G to A.S.

Still not.

> You see, if you really have reasons to want to be separated from the you of
> before you have to drop that old M.O. or drop all those old topics or both.

More arguing the messenger

> You did neither. Thus while you might have incorporated a posting name
> change, you didn't really try to hide who you were.  And since the old
> M.O., Topics, etc were brought back, well that qualified linking to all
> those old discussions, examples, points made, lies of yours exposed, etc.
> fair. 

More ad homs.

> You were constantly identifying yourself, just like the below:

Nope, he just couldn't do it...