
www.Usenet.com
| <-- __Chronological__ --> | <-- __Thread__ --> |
A sports model for education Over the past few years I've been doing some thinking about how some, particularly in education, exhibit a certain distain for competition and sports in general. History and archeology is strewn with examples of how humankind has competed with one another. This long history demonstrates that competition is basic to our makeup and ingrained in our psyche. Given the historical evidence and importance of sports in today's society, let me turn to education's rejection of this basic need and pose a paradigm shift in think on how a sports model could shed new light on the education process. Now, my thinking in this area is a work-in-progress. So, I invite you to comment, make suggestions on improvements or generally offer reasons why this would not be a viable alternative to the current organizational methods used in education today. Currently, it has been my experience, that in lower grades classes are generally taught by a homeroom teacher with higher performing students breaking out into math and literature beginning about third grade. I would pose that lead teachers draft their class just as a professional football coach/team would draft their players, rotating the teacher choices one-by-one. At kindergarten each child would be rated initially by an entry level test to determine their current level of knowledge. As they progress through the year and earn their grades, take achievement tests and work on projects their rating in relation to each other student would be established by their performance. Each week or month students could compete in "College Bowl" type venues, science projects, art shows, music recitals and conventional achievement tests and winners/runner-ups declared. Subjective contests could be judges by independent judges drawn from the business community. At the end of the year they would have established their rating for the next year. The class would become a team for the year. Two possible directions could go from here. The school could chose to have the next grades teachers draft a new team or the lead teachers would moving with the class/team (thus becoming their permanent head coach) as they progressed through the grades. Sticking with the team as they moved from grade to grade. As the teachers reached the top grade in that school they would start with another team at the entry level (ie. grade school teacher would progress from K-6, Middle school teachers 7-8 or 9 and High School teacher 9 or 10-12) Teachers would receive bonus pay commensurate with their teams performance. An assistant math and literature coach/teacher could be made a part of the coaching staff as well as other specialties (art, coral music, band music instruction, etc.) to augment the lead teachers expertise. If a student found some incompatibility with a certain teacher or team they could be traded to another team/teacher, Special needs students would have a "Handicap" that would allow them to compete at their level of competence. This team approach assures that the most capable students would help those struggling because it would be a team effort. An air of cooperation would permeate the class because their wins would depend on the teams wins. The numerous variety of teaching methods in vogue these days could quickly be evaluated and adopted or rejected for their effectiveness. Generally families can be divided into two categories. Those who stress academics over sports and those who think playing a sports is equal, if not more important than academics. My family is weighted to the academic side, but I appreciate that acing a math or science test does not give you the same thrill that winning a game, hitting a home run, or sinking a critical basket, can achieve. As a matter of fact just the opposite is sometimes present in school these days. My daughter is an MIT Chemistry graduate who in middle school and early high school would purposely blow a test because it was not cool to be too smart. Turning education into a sport could elevate getting A's to the level of being an ace pitcher with all the commensurate accolades. This is a brief synopsis, but I invite you expand on it, criticize this approach and offer your suggestions or objections. Of course, as I am not steeped in the history of education, their may be some researched being done in this area of which I am unaware. If this is the case please point me in the direction of such research. Regards, Michael Swaine
| <-- __Chronological__ --> | <-- __Thread__ --> |