
www.Usenet.com
| <-- __Chronological__ --> | <-- __Thread__ --> |
"Mylon" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message news:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > "jabriol" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message > news:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > "Kate " <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message > > news:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > On Tue, 23 Sep 2003 22:29:48 GMT, "jabriol" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > >"Maverick" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message > > > >news:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > >> JaBrIoL wrote: > > > >> > > > >> > Why do so many science teachers in America promote mindless, chance > > > >> > evolution as fact? One reason is that "Darwinist fundamentalists . > . > > . > > > >> > control the science departments in many universities," says Phillip > > E. > > > >> > Johnson, law professor at the University of California at Berkeley. > > > >> > > > >> Because evolution is the best theory that we have today. > > > >> > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > >ahhhhh so .... it must be taught as the only method that man arrived on > > the > > > >planet, beside contradictions, lack of transitionals, and or incomplete > > > >fossil records... I see. > > > > > > Straw man. > > > > > > No evidence is ever complete. The only way it could be is if you > > > yourself were there to observe what happened. > > > > > > Exactly, yet biology teachers does not teach this. they teach that the > truth > > are in the bones. > > That species change over time is FACT. which of the 5 different defintion of species are you refering to? > We have witnessed this in > laboratories and in the real world. The common cold is an evolving virus > that changes itself enough that your immune system does not recognize it the > second time around. it is still a virus. > That is evolution at work. How evolution occoured > between the start of life and now is what is still classified under the > realm of theory, yet given the fact of evolution, it isn't very hard at all > to support this theory. > > The "gaps" in the fossil record are merely an excuse used by creationists. I am not a creationist, and real scientists admit to "gaps" > For a truly "complete" fossil record, we would have to have a fossil of > every ancestor of every living thing on the planet. yup >If, say, ants were to > be looked at by themselves, we'd need a phenomonal amount of fossils just > for the last million years, much less the past 3 billion years for all of > life on Earth. A complete fossil record is not only an impossibility, it's > also an absurdity. then education allows an absurdity to be taught? > > > > If complete evidence was required to prove anything, nothing could be > > > proved - no one would ever be judged guilty and science would not > > > exist. > > > > not true. and how many people based on faulty evidence, goes to death row > > for years, then released??? > > Evolution has been on "death row" for a good long time now. If there any > counter evidence, it would have been "released" and no longer regarded as a > valid theory. > you are right TOE is on death row. > > > To push this crap is essentially revealing you have a motive and are > > > trying to lie to people. > > > > no lie here.. > > There goes another one. > >
| <-- __Chronological__ --> | <-- __Thread__ --> |