Re: Talk.Origin banned Subject: Do not textbooks present evolution as fact?

"jabriol" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message news:<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>...

> Snip+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

The Internet's biggest coward, biggest hypocrite, biggest liar, and
most useless thread opener in history strikes again.

I am *still waiting** for Jabriol to provide for me a **LIST** of
these "colossal holes" he claims are in the Theory of Evolution.  Been
waiting for that since late August.  Not holding my breath.

I am *still waiting** for him to admit that regardless of what it is
classed as, and regardless of whether it was or was not in the line to
birds, the archaeopteryx had pretty much a fifty-fifty mix of
reptile/dino-bird features and therefore represented an example of a
potential intermediate stage.

I am *still waiting* for him to admit that many examples of dinosaurs
with feathers have now been uncovered.  Prior to those, only birds
were thought to have feathers.  Now we know that isn't true, and there
are intermediate stages, in which organisms have feathers but are not
birds.

I am *still waiting** for him to admit that the okapi is pretty much
what a transitional giraffe would have looked like.

I am *still waiting** for him to explain why something akin to a
mouse, could not change 300 genes over 60 million years to become
either human or a modern mouse

I am *still waiting** for him to acknowledge that no evolutionist has
ever claimed that modern birds evolved from modern reptiles and that
argument from incredulity addressing this non-issue, no matter how
ancient it is, does not constitute a colossal hole in the Theory of
Evolution.

That's just a small sample of the unanswered questions and challenges
Jabriol has left behind in his cowardly dash to escape exposure.

The one good thing about Jabriol is that he has convincingly
demonstrated evolution!  Since August he has evolved from a chicken
into a jackass (or is it the other way around?).

Budikka