Re: Talk.Origin banned Subject: Do not textbooks present evolution as fact?

"jabriol" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> "Bob LeChevalier" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
> news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > "jabriol" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > >"Bob LeChevalier" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
> > >news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > >> If there was ONE definition, he would not have to read FIVE books in
> > >> order to find it.
> > >>
> > >same defintion in all five.. a real christian would know
> >
> > There is no definition, nor even a sentence that is repeated in all
> > five books.  It is interpretation that would cause someone to THINK
> > that different words in different books are saying the same thing.
> >
>
> nope, it quite simple... for a true christian.
>
> > >> >If I told you, you would claim.. it is a JW standard.
> > >> >therefore I sent to the source that the JW's use.
> > >>
> > >> The JW use a doctored Bible, among other things:
> > >> http://www.jude3.net/JWISDM.HTM
> > >>
> > >> The JW deny the physical resurrection of Christ.
> > >> http://www.jude3.net/JWRES.HTM
> > >> >Jehovah's Witnesses deny that Jesus was raised bodily from the dead.
> > >> > Instead, they claim that he was raised a spirit creature without a
> > >> > physical body. According to them, the nature of Christ's
resurrection
> > >> > was spiritual and not physical.
> > >
> > >golly.. then your source is as about as bogus as you are christian.
> >
> > I'm waiting for you to prove me wrong.  Your statement is not proof.
> >
> >
>
> next JW that knock on your door..ask them

Next JW's that knock on my door will get the same treatment they always do -
a closed door.