www.Usenet.com
www.Usenet.com
| <-- __Chronological__ --> | <-- __Thread__ --> |
"jabriol" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >"Bob LeChevalier" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message >news:[EMAIL PROTECTED] >> "jabriol" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> >> >but to many there is no God, >> >> >> >> So therefore they neither have, nor need, religious morals. >> > >> >so said a "true christian" >> >> Yep. It is patently obvious that many atheists have stronger moral >> codes than many Christians. Their moral codes aren't religious. Why >> would they need a religious moral code? > >Then stop calling yourself a christian, and become an atheist. Why should I call myself what I am not. >Your one step closer to it anyway, since you call Jesus a liar, No I don't. >and Genesis a myth. It is. >as for morals of an atheist, yes there are some good nes around. But other >have no problem with homosexuality, or fornication. It's no one else's business. That is between them and their God. >Practices the bible clearly condems... So what? The Bible clearly condemns eating pork, says that we should stone our kids to death if they are disrespectful, and that it is fine to own slaves. >> >ahh I see, so biology was born with evolution. >> >> Modern biology was. > >I see, old biology is worthless then... Compared to modern biology, yes. Or would you rather return to 1850's medicine. >> >said a "true christian" >> >> Also a true scientist. Science and religion are orthogonal. Neither >> has need of the other. >> >yup.. you are more an atheist than a christian.. no doubt. Nope. But it is between me and God. Your opinion is utterly worthless. >Jesus said that all life depend on God. Cite? >you just said science does not. It doesn't. >have you read the bible.. even once? Yes. lojbab -- lojbab [EMAIL PROTECTED] Bob LeChevalier, Founder, The Logical Language Group (Opinions are my own; I do not speak for the organization.) Artificial language Loglan/Lojban: http://www.lojban.org
| <-- __Chronological__ --> | <-- __Thread__ --> |
