Re: Talk.Origin banned Subject: Do not textbooks present evolution as fact?

"jabriol" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> >but to many there is no God,
>>
>> So therefore they neither have, nor need, religious morals.
>
>so said a "true christian"

Yep.  It is patently obvious that many atheists have stronger moral
codes than many Christians.  Their moral codes aren't religious.  Why
would they need a religious moral code?

>> >and evolution is use as a tool by atheist to
>> >promote this notion in the american public school system.
>>
>> Evolution is used as a tool to promote biology.
>
>ahh I see, so biology was born with evolution.

Modern biology was.

>> It has NOTHING to do
>> with morality, and it is primarily right wing extremists, edging up to
>> Nazis and other racists, that argue for ANY social implication of the
>> theory of evolution.
>>
>> EVERYTHING in science is godless, not just evolutionary theory.  There
>> is no place for God in science, since there can be no natural evidence
>> that the supernatural exists (else it would not be supernatural, but
>> merely natural).
>
>said a "true christian"

Also a true scientist.  Science and religion are orthogonal.  Neither
has need of the other.

lojbab
-- 
lojbab                                             [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bob LeChevalier, Founder, The Logical Language Group
(Opinions are my own; I do not speak for the organization.)
Artificial language Loglan/Lojban:                 http://www.lojban.org