Re: Talk.Origin banned Subject: Do not textbooks present evolution as fact?

"jabriol" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> "Bob LeChevalier" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
> news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > "jabriol" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > >"Alex" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
> > >news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > >> On Thu, 16 Oct 2003 04:52:01 GMT, "Smitty Jagermanjenson"
> > >> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > >>
> > >> >So, to you who does not even have the backbone to stand up with
> honesty
> > >and
> > >> >decency for your own religious delusions - go to hell and quit
> pestering
> > >the
> > >> >rest of us. Asshole.
> > >>
> > >> Don't christians believe you actually *do* go to Hell if you deny the
> > >> Lord?
> > >
> > >chrestians who accept evolution as the origin of man, calls the lord a
> liar.
> >
> > No.  They call the writers of the Bible ignorant pre-modern
> > superstitious types who did not know better.  *Intelligent* Christians
> > have no problem reconciling their faith with a Bible that isn't a
> > documentary but rather a collection of myths and legends that have
> > some elements of truth, but were interpreted by people who knew less
> > than we now know.
> >
> sure.. A buddist would say this.. a real christian would not.

Since when are you qualified to decide what a real Christian is? The guy you
are judging can say the same thing about you with equal credibility. So why
are you right?