Re: Talk.Origin banned Subject: Do not textbooks present evolution as fact?

"Gray Shockley" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> On Fri, 17 Oct 2003 13:24:24 -0500, Lane Lewis wrote
> (in message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>):
>
> >
> > "JaBrIoL" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
> > news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >> Gray Shockley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
> > news:<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>...
> >>> On Thu, 16 Oct 2003 17:15:06 -0500, jabriol wrote
> >>> (in message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>):
> >>>
> >>>>
> >>>> "Alex" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
> >>>> news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >>>>> On Thu, 16 Oct 2003 04:52:01 GMT, "Smitty Jagermanjenson"
> >>>>> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >>>>>
> >>>>>> So, to you who does not even have the backbone to stand up with
> > honesty
> >>> and
> >>>>>> decency for your own religious delusions - go to hell and quit
> > pestering
> >>> the
> >>>>>> rest of us. Asshole.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Don't christians believe you actually *do* go to Hell if you deny
the
> >>>>> Lord?
> >>>>
> >>>> chrestians who accept evolution as the origin of man, calls the lord
a
> > liar.
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>
> >>> Doesn't it bother you - even just a wee bit - that nearly all of the
> > people
> >>> who agree with you are also functionally illiterate?
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>
> >> English is not my first language. I do not understand what you are
trying
> > to say.
> >
> > Then why do try and post to some very sensitive english language
newsgroups,
> > and why the insistence to crosspost from t.o. to these very senseitive
> > groups. If your command of english is that poor why not stick with
groups in
> > your own language.
> >
> > Lane
> >
> >
>
> Actually, I was out of line on my remark.
>
> Apologies to jabriol.
>
>
> Gray
>

Since I did not understand the comment no offense taken, no apologies
needed.