
www.Usenet.com
| <-- __Chronological__ --> | <-- __Thread__ --> |
"Jerry Abbott" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message news:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > "Peter van Velzen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message > news:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > "Jerry Abbott" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message > news:<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>... > > > > > > Social diversity and complexity can't be avoided either. Indeed, > for > > > many > > > of > > > > > > us, it is the joy of life. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > However, the complicating factors intrinsic to racial mixture can > > > certainly > > > > > be avoided. For much of history, they were avoided. > > > > > > > > False. > > > > > > > > > True. By and large, and except at geographical crossroads, tribes were > far > > > from multicultural. The rise of civilization, when it occurred at such > > > crossroads, were partly the result of a military demand to keep > foreigners > > > at arm's length. > > > > Interesting difference in point of view. > > These factors were not purpusely avoided, > > but they hardly ever occured due to geographical seperation. > > > During their periods of high culture, nearly all civilizations were > relatively racially homogeneous and kept foreign elements at arm's length. This is false. > The means by which the separation was enforced varied: ancient Aryan India > used an overt racial caste system, ancient Egypt kept the nubian slaves in > their places. The unification of Egypt occurred when the Upper Nile conquered the Lower Nile, combining two disparate cultures. It seems you are wrong again. <snip more racist justifications> You've already indicated in this thread that other people's opinions don't matter, that you would force your racist apartheid on the world if you had the chance. You would tell me who to associate with, who I can befriend, who I can do business with, who I can love. You are a racist and a fascist. Please.
| <-- __Chronological__ --> | <-- __Thread__ --> |