Re: Public Schools Science Education: What Biology teachers are forced to teach

"David Jensen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> In alt.talk.creationism, [EMAIL PROTECTED] (JaBrIoL) wrote in
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
> >David Jensen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>...
> >> In alt.talk.creationism, [EMAIL PROTECTED] (JaBrIoL) wrote in
> >> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> >>
> >> >[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Frank J) wrote in message
news:<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>...
> >> >> "Denis Loubet" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>...
> >> >> > "JaBrIoL" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
> >> >> > news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >> >> > > Why do so many science teachers in America promote mindless,
chance
> >> >> > > evolution as fact?
> >> >> >
> >> >> > Because the only alternative is an infinite regression of
designers, and
> >> >> > that's just stupid.
> >> >>
> >> >> Evolution says nothing about whether there is or isn't a designer,
so
> >> >> the alternative (testable scientific explanation) would not either.
> >> >
> >> >However evolution is the theory that atheist would use to disaprove a
> >> >designer, and to put forth their agendas that an alternative to the
> >> >origin of man not be used in the american public school system.
> >>
> >> The US Constitution is the reason that religious stories about the
> >> origin of man cannot be taught in American public schools. Hope this
> >> correction helps.
> >
> >who sain that the alternative "must" be a "religious" one?
>
> You brought up religion.

No, I brought up alternatives.

>
> The only current 'alternatives' are religious.


incorrect.. panspermia is an alternative.
drop off by an exterrestial culture is another.



> >hope this explanation helps...
>
> You offered no explanation.


Your reading comprehension is not my problem.