
www.Usenet.com
| <-- __Chronological__ --> | <-- __Thread__ --> |
"David Jensen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message news:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > In alt.talk.creationism, "jabriol" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > > > >"David Jensen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message > >news:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > >> In alt.talk.creationism, "jabriol" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in > >> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > >> > >> > > >> >"David Jensen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message > >> >news:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > >> ... > >> >> If you don't think we should take theology directions from programmers, > >> >> why should we take claims about biology from a lawyer? > >> > > >> >his comments has nothing to do with biology, it has to do with > >educational policy > >> >about the method used by educational authorities in teaching evolution > >in > >> >the classroom. > >> > >> Really? Doesn't he actually have to know something about biology before > >> he critiques how it is taught? > > > >how many lawyer actually take the time to study any case, they just do a > >basic research, and come to conclusions, I am sure this is what this law > >professor did. > > What an interesting defense. > > >beside he was reffering to biology professors, therfore he should be well > >verse in methods of teaching, what is allowed and what is not. > > Why? Do law professors teach a lot of biology? who knows, I had a prossesor who taught Engineering and Humanities.. again ask him... > > ... > > >> So you don't have an appropriate reference that actually supports what > >> you claim. Okay. > >> >
| <-- __Chronological__ --> | <-- __Thread__ --> |