
www.Usenet.com
| <-- __Chronological__ --> | <-- __Thread__ --> |
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, "Mark Richardson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > "REP" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message > news:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, > > "Mark Richardson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > Counselling is not going to work. Something more effective, in terms of > the > > > culture of the people, is what is required. Right now, there does not > appear > > > to be any appreciation of "cause and effect". People know that having > sex > > > can result in having children, but that does not seem to register at the > > > moment critique. > > > > When women are given birth control and told how to use it, they do so > > and have smaller families. Many African women are not in a position to > > refuse sex (or to do it and live), so birth control that does not rely > > on the husband (like condoms) would be a terrific first step. Once women > > are able to control their fertility, they are better able to become > > economically independent. General education for women is another thing > > that lowers fertility rates, and I can't see any downside to that. > > > > I am no expert, but everything I have read on the subject says that > > readily available contraceptives for women would not only be more > > effective than involuntary sterilization, it avoids the ethical quandry. > > Of course, voluntary sterilization should be readily available to anyone > > who wants it. > > > Define "given birth control". Is this a reference to depo provera? The articles I read were about The Pill. Depo might present problems, since it can cause amenorrhea, which might be difficult for women trying to hide their contraceptive use. > In fact, making sure that every "at risk" female had access to a method of > birth control will be as difficult as making sure that every HIV positive > woman has access to ARVs. Difficult does not mean not worth doing. > There is an obvious ethical question to be raised in regard to involuntary > sterilization, but what about the ethical question of bearing children when > there are no means to support them? I can't think of a culture where women relish seeing their children die. Putting contraceptives into the hands of women, along with education, are two of the surest way to regulate fertility without coercion. -- "Did Father shoot him? I will eat Grandfather for dinner." - Helen Keller, on learning of the death of her grandfather
| <-- __Chronological__ --> | <-- __Thread__ --> |