
www.Usenet.com
| <-- __Chronological__ --> | <-- __Thread__ --> |
Owain wrote: > > "CyberCypher" wrote > | > Yellow fever, the disease that killed 4,000 Philadelphia's in > | > 1793 and so decimated Memphis, Tennessee that the city lost its > | > charter, has reappeared after nearly two decades in abeyance in > | > the Western Hemisphere. > | Second, it delays the main point of the sentence until a secondary > | historical point is made. The most important information in the > | sentence is that yellow fever is back. What it did to Philadelphians > | in 1793 is secondary and the kind of background stuff that newspapers > | ought to save for paragraph 2. > > It also omits an important point, i.e. *where* the yellow fever has > reappeared. > Maybe that's in the next sentence. It is sort of difficult to operate at such complete cross-purposes, on the one hand trying to force all the information into one sentence, and on the other trying to write only "See Spot Run" type sentences. -- "Throw me that lipstick, darling, I wanna redo my stigmata." +-Jennifer Saunders, "Absolutely Fabulous"
| <-- __Chronological__ --> | <-- __Thread__ --> |