
www.Usenet.com
| <-- __Chronological__ --> | <-- __Thread__ --> |
On 18 Nov 2003 15:56:42 GMT, CyberCypher <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >I think the sentence is too packed with information. I agree. >It's bad >journalistic writing for two reasons, IMHO. > >First, it's too long. It has 33 words, and readability statistics >suggest that 22 words is the longest sentence that is easily >readable. Best steer clear of Proust and Joyce then... :-) >Second, it delays the main point of the sentence until a secondary >historical point is made. The most important information in the >sentence is that yellow fever is back. What it did to Philadelphians >in 1793 is secondary and the kind of background stuff that newspapers >ought to save for paragraph 2. I regard that part as a sort of aside, a rhetorical stage whisper, which is why I used brackets. What you refer to as Em-dashes (-- ?) would have served too. Where does that terminology for dashes come from by the way? An editor's/printer's nomenclature?
| <-- __Chronological__ --> | <-- __Thread__ --> |