Re: Ray attempts Biblical justification: was Re: U.N. rules Canada should ban spanking

Kane:

When somebody's JOB is to check background
and they have ready access to such a search,
but they don't bother, that is culpable.
 
You know it, the courts know it, and agencies
and caseworkers have been learning it over
and over again.

When a caseworker swears in an affidavit that
I have a sex abuse history, and I don't,
that should be perjury.

At the least, before he SWORE to it, he should
have looked it up on a computer.  He did not.
 
Why should this ass be immune in such a case?

He should be free to LIE?
(The 2 year unwillingness to correct makes
 it no longer a mere technical mistake.)

A large number of parents who have dealt with
CPS have found that this "immunity" amounts
to a freedom for caseworkers to DELIBERATELY LIE.

Thank God the immunity is not absolute, no thanks
to any STATE, however.

Freedom to do their job?
Give me a break.

38 visits to starving New Jersey kids and
that is not a "Failure to Protect" criminal charge?