Re: Ray attempts Biblical justification: was Re: U.N. rules Canada should ban spanking

On 24 Nov 2003 04:46:15 -0800, [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Greg Hanson)
wrote:

>Kane wrote
>> You think one worker that didn't get
>> reported equated with ALL parents
>> being reported. Prove it.
>
>Your equation, your problem.

Your equation. You made the accusation, not I. 

>Why should I prove something I never said?

Oh, I see. Then you AREN'T accusing CPS of being remiss. Excellent. I
knew you'd grow up.

>However, even ONE caseworker caught at child
>molesting is something the community should
>be made aware of.  Don't you think, Kane?

Oh darn, I was wrong. Still a sniveling whining child. 

Now tell us, as I asked before, how is it the "community" didn't know
but YOU did?

>> >Clearly some favoritism exists.
>
>> I've not seen that. In fact I have never
>> in all these years seen a single instance
>> where a client of CPS, unless they have
>> been accused of murder, get newscoverage.
>
>Well, CRIMINAL CHARGES are ALL reported in
>our local newspaper, at the PROSECUTORS
>descretion. It's a quite busy column!
>Interesting eh?

Yes. Another pointless comeback in an effort to avoid answering. 

>> So you always set traps for people?
>
>Kane, this is PRECIOUS!  You did it to yourself!

You'll be able to explain that won't you...below...

ah...no, nothing. I thought so. 

>
>> Is this how you parented the little girl?
>> No wonder she pissed herself.
>> She had to guess what shit you'd come up
>> with next to torture her with.
>
>But the girl generally had the problem
>in the middle of her school day.

Under the tension of being around you, a spanker and otherwise
punishment oriented caregiver, that may have been the only place she
could feel safe enough to start indicating her terror of you. She
probably wasn't even aware of how terrified she was, consciously.

>She also told us truthfully that she
>held her bladder because she didn't
>want to take 5 minutes out of school fun
>to go to the bathroom.  Kids do this.

Why yes they do. I find it very natural child behavior,
developmentally. And some girls leak a little when they laugh. There
are feminine products advertised in the ladies' magazines.

>And you've been told this many times.

Oh, long before you mentioned it. Perfectly natural. 

But it seems you aren't going anywhere with this apology for your
brutal torture of her in the name of "discipline" for peeing, right?
No of course not.

>> So tell me, if it wasn't in the media how
>> did you manage to find out about it?
>
>It was completely blacked out HERE until the
>guy did it in COLORADO SPRINGS, COLORADO.

Your reliance on your indignation to motivate you to keep breathing is
an over rated excuse for you to continue living. I'd say give up your
indignation.

It never get's you anywhere. Besides, it's misplaced. 

It doesn't get children back to their parents, and the relevance of
the point you are making escapes me, other than yet another attempt to
try and convince this ng you care about children.....patently untrue
by the evidence of your posts.

>Isn't the internet wonderful?

Yep. I've always been a fan. I especially like that it can disseminate
so much information about creeps such as you and their little girl
showering antics.

>> I mean what with Iowa CPS keeping it
>> all hush hush. And how did the authorities
>> in Colorado find out about this carefully
>> kept secret?
>
>ONLY after he was caught molesting THERE!

Excellent. I noticed you still blame Colorado for not checking more
closely.....but admit that the information was rather hard to come
by...since until this event he was listed only as a child neglecter.

>That caused a lot of fussing in COLORADO
>about how the CPS dorks there never did any
>background check and actually hired a
>KNOWN PEDOFILE CASEWORKER.

Colorado knew he was a pedophile? How would they know that before he
offended again if when he was hired he hadn't offended in Colorado and
he was not on a sex offenders list anywhere in the country, certainly
not Iowa, according to you?

How many hours of stupidity practice do you do a day, Greegor? 

Is that why you can't find time to look for a job? 

>> Come on, dimwit, don't you know by now
>> I know how you find out about
>> it and they got it from the media?
>
>Commander McBrag, Do Tell!

Greegor the Whore, yes, I do tell alright. 

>> And what did he offer in exchange for this "bargain"?
>
>Don't know.

Then on what grounds are you making the accusation or claim? Somebody
told you? How did they find out so much?
 
>> Trust me on this. I know criminals.
>
>Yes, It's the WORLD OF COMMANDER MCBRAG!

I know criminals...and you kinda quietly snipped a little bit there,
now didn't you, and that reminds me of the cons I've worked with.

>You nit picked about the "bargaining" but you
>never explained why the criminal charges were
>brought forth and then DISMISSED.

Ah..I think here I'm supposed to agree with your indignation and fly
into a rage at Iowa for you, and write them a "motion" of my own on a
par with yours, right?

Fat chance, dummy. I'm not going to HELP you keep that mother and
child separated.

Even at this late a date I daily wish for the mother to wake up and
can her "SO," "Fiance" gigolo.

>You focused instead on the REGISTRY.

Yes. I did pay attention to that, given that what, when, how, and who
seems to be a factor in examining events.

I think YOU focused on your asshole far too much. 

>> >Case ID Title Name DOB
>> >06571  FECR009803
>> >STATE OF IOWA VS RANTZ, GEOFFREY DEL
>> >DOB 12/08/1974  Offence date: August 1, 1994
>> >-------------------------------------------------
>> >Count 01 Charge Charge: 709.8 Description: LASCIVIOUS ACTS WITH A
>>  CHILD (FELD)
>> >Offense Date:  08/01/1994 Arrest Date:  Against Type: 
>> >Adjudication Charge:
>> >709.8 Description: LASCIVIOUS ACTS WITH A CHILD (FELD) 
>> >Adj.: DISMISSED Adj.Date: 09/19/1996
>> >Adj.Judge: KOEHLER, THOMAS L 
>> >-----------------------------------------------
>> >Count 02 Charge Charge: 
>> > 709.4-2 Description: DNU - SEXUAL ABUSE 3RD DEGREE - 1978 (FELC) 
>> >           Offense Date:  08/01/1994 Arrest Date:  Against Type:
>
>Kane wrote
>> this was a skillful criminal who
>> figured out how to slide through
>> the checks in the system.
>
>That would imply there WERE checks to slide through.
>There were NOT.

You are prepared to assert publically, and hopefully in your hometown
newspaper and on TV interviews, that the state of Iowa does not do
background checks on employees doing casework for their CPS, right?

Go for it. 

That will most assuredly help your "SO"s case, yessiree. 

Do you sit around all day while she's out working to support your
sorry lazy ass figuring out how to fuck over her more than you already
have the day before?

>> Thanks for all the information, finally. Much
>> quicker this time.
>
>It was on the net, just like I said.

I'm not obligated to research every sentence or even claim you post. 

>> I'll get you to come to heel yet, boy.
>
>Megalomania AGAIN?
>Get over yourself.

I'll get you to come to hell yet, boy. 

>> That little trickster will probably do all he
>> can, as cons do, to get out early, and go
>> back to scammin one way or another.
>
>Yeah, but you said you personally ARCHIVE all of this.

Show me where I said "all" of what you post. I might archive all of a
particularly noisesome or comically ridiculous thread...but not your
entire posting history.

>Store it on your bookshelf next to your
>jars of urine, Doctor Strangelove.

No question mark? Give me orders? Weird. 

You have such a facination with me. From my "dangling" parts now onto
my excretions.

Are you sure you aren't just a little bit .. you know .. a little bit
fixated?

I know I am....on what you did to that mother and child that will
effect them for the rest of their lives.

You are just another lowlife self serving little bloodsucker. 

Get over yourself. 

Kane