Re: Ray attempts Biblical justification: was Re: U.N. rules Canada should ban spanking

"Greg Hanson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Kane:
> You have me at a distinct disadvantage since I don't
> read NAMBLA literature or posts.

Kane never said he read NAMBLA literature or posts.

Kane wrote, "I've seen in transcripts of NAMBLA member testimony."

Besides it's well known that your victim was a little girl, not a boy.

> What happened, did Geoff Rantz leave a copy laying
> around in your lunchroom?
> How many NAMBLA caseworkers work in your CPS office?
>
> I didn't use my hands to shampoo the child.
> That is what you said, old chap, and what I refuted.

Sorry, Greg,

Here's what Kane wrote,

"how did you manage to push the little girl's head under the shower stream
to "rinse out the shampoo" you claim she missed and couldn't manage to go
back and rinse on her own, use your foot?"

Kane did NOT claim that you used your hands to shampoo the child.

> I did use my hands to push her head under
> a shower spray to rinse shampoo out.

Which is EXACTLY what Kane wrote.

I'd love to see you on the witness stand, Greg.

> Parents and more interestingly, Foster Parents
> do this sort of thing all the time and it does
> not raise a fuss.  It is legal.

Little girls with their foster mothers.

You don't mean the foster parents bring in adult males un-related to the
children to handle little girls in the shower, do you?

> Clearly, Child Protection knew that it was
> a big nothing, since they had to exaggerate
> it to state that I "pushed her head under water"
> which is quite a different thing from pushing
> her head under a shower spray to rinse shampoo out.

Either way you were in the bathroom with your hands on a little girl who
wasn't finished showering.

> And nothing I did was a crime.

Massively inappropriate.

And one of the many reasons the little girl was removed by CPS

> You imagine perversion because is suits your dirty cause.

It's a "dirty cause" to support and promote the proper treatment of
children?

But it's not a "dirty cause" to promote un-related adult males physically
handling naked little girls in the bathroom before and after they've
finished showering?

Not to mention the fact that AFTER your girlfriends little girl was removed
you "volunteered" to the court to "TEACH a Pro-Spanking parenting class in
the
community."

Isn't that a little like teaching a group of rapists about "safe sex?"