Re: Ray attempts Biblical justification: was Re: U.N. rules Canada should ban spanking

Dennis H wrote
> What if parents don't want or need his help?

If a parent is willing to just play guilty, no reason.
 
If however a parent or advocate wishes to fight
the insanity of CPS workers, something like the
"Lot's Daughters" gambit is very illustrative
of caseworker lies, deviousness and fairy tales.
 
In fact this story was circulated among people in
the closed groups and of the many people there
never did any one of them say that they did not
want to see it.  If anything, it became another
example to galvanize people against LIES CPS USES.

To think that a caseworker would DARE to write up
such an insane accusation and use it on a family
informs anti-CPS people of how corrupt CPS really is.
 
If a parent ignores cases and situations that
don't apply to them at the time, they may discover
that later on the same tactic might actually
be tried on their family.
 
Just because CPS has not falsely accused my family of
Munchhausens by proxy, does not mean that I should
stay ignorant of the agency abuses and how they
MISUSE and ABUSE that angle to hurt families.
Much like the standard CPS Modus Operandi about
Spiral fractures (always Child abuse?  Lie.) the
CPS Modus Operandi for supposed Munchhausens
repeats over and over.  It's money on the CPS table.

Perhaps Dennis, you are not aware that Dan has
been an enigma when it comes to correcting CPS.
He claims to be for parents, but it seems more like
in a Benedict Arnold way.
 
That's why I was asking him to REVEAL what he knows.
He is in a bind if he wants to continue to support
Child Protection Services while pretending to support
parents against them.