
www.Usenet.com
Group Index
Misc Thread Archive from Usenet.com
Re: Ray attempts Biblical justification: was Re: U.N. rules Canada should ban spanking
- __From__: Dennis Hancock
- __Subject__: Re: Ray attempts Biblical justification: was Re: U.N. rules Canada should ban spanking
- __Date__: Sat, 15 Nov 2003 22:46:22 -0600
"Greg Hanson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Regarding the "Lot's Daughters" scam played
> by a caseworker, after acting very
> incredulous and doubting:
>
> Dan wrote
> > Don't bother.
> > It's part of a case I worked on.
>
> Golly! Isn't that special!
>
> So, Dan, was it one of the cases you worked
> on before Kane began helping you with every
> single case you work on?
>
> I ask because Kane says he never heard of this
> little gem. How could that be?
>
> And you keep saying that you are out
> to help parents versus CPS..
>
> Please make this little gem public, so that
> parents all over the United States and even
> around the world can KNOW the truth about
> Child Protective Services caseworkers using
> this "Lot's Daughters" caseworker scam.
>
> You say you're out to help parents, so don't hold back!
What if parents don't want or need his help?
Re: Ray attempts Biblical justification: was Re: U.N. rules Canada should ban spanking,
Dan Sullivan
Re: Ray attempts Biblical justification: was Re: U.N. rules Canada should ban spanking,
Dan Sullivan
Re: Ray attempts Biblical justification: was Re: U.N. rules Canada should ban spanking,
Kane
Re: Ray attempts Biblical justification: was Re: U.N. rules Canada should ban spanking,
Greg Hanson
Re: Ray attempts Biblical justification: was Re: U.N. rules Canada should ban spanking,
Dan Sullivan
Re: Ray attempts Biblical justification: was Re: U.N. rules Canada should ban spanking,
Dennis Hancock
Re: Ray attempts Biblical justification: was Re: U.N. rules Canada should ban spanking,
Dan Sullivan
Re: Ray attempts Biblical justification: was Re: U.N. rules Canada should ban spanking,
Dennis Hancock