Re: Ray attempts Biblical justification: was Re: U.N. rules Canada should ban spanking

[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Greg Hanson) wrote in message news:<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>...
> Regarding the "Lot's Daughters" scam played
> by a caseworker, after acting very
> incredulous and doubting:
> 
> Dan wrote
> > Don't bother.
> > It's part of a case I worked on.
> 
> Golly!   Isn't that special!

I would say so, wouldn't you?
 
> So, Dan, was it one of the cases you worked
> on before Kane began helping you with every
> single case you work on?

I make it a point not to press Dan for details he doesn't offer. It's
out of respect for those folks he is working with. I don't need to
know.
 
> I ask because Kane says he never heard of this
> little gem.

Citation please...my post preferred. Point to where I said I "never
heard of this little gem." I didn't say one way or another, as I
recall.

> How could that be?

Your overheated braincells from taking in too much bongwater? 
 
> And you keep saying that you are out
> to help parents versus CPS..

He offerred to help even you, only to discover you didn't want real
help as that wasn't your game. My guess, given his success rate and
the extreme difficulty of the situations he's taken on, strongly
suggest he could have had your situation cleared up and the child home
in six months tops.

Maybe as quickly as a couple of weeks if you had gotten to him soon
enough, and been willing to forego your little plan for sitting and
sueing.
 
> Please make this little gem public, so that
> parents all over the United States and even
> around the world can KNOW the truth about
> Child Protective Services caseworkers using
> this "Lot's Daughters" caseworker scam.

What is the truth about it? And how do you wish Dan to make it public?
Will you help with the expenses...say from your can and bottle money?

On the other hand, without the explicit permission of the family
involved I have a hunch you won't see much detail. There is a matter
of privacy, you know.

And families that get their children back are often not completely
without risk of yet another attempt by CPS on them.

You still out to help families are you? R R R R R 

What an unmitigated prick you are. 
  
> You say you're out to help parents, so don't hold back!

He doesn't have to say he is out to help parents. It's already quite
obvious to anyone that cares to google on his name in his addy.

A more interesting google on a name though, to find out what someone
who claims, wrongfully and deceptively, to want to help parents, would
be yours. I can't remember a single time you have done a single thing
to actually help anyone, and most especially your "fiance."

You have repeatedly offered advice to parents in dire straights with
CPS that would insure they would lose their children, or vastly
increase the odds against them. I think it's that old misery loves
company thing with you...or a cover-up for what you have done to that
family of mother and child.

You are beginning to sound very desparate, Greegor. Can we count on
something new happening in the Greegor, little girl, and "fiance"
story soon?

Kane