
www.Usenet.com
Group Index
Misc Thread Archive from Usenet.com
Re: Ray attempts Biblical justification: was Re: U.N. rules Canada should ban spanking
- __From__: Dan Sullivan
- __Subject__: Re: Ray attempts Biblical justification: was Re: U.N. rules Canada should ban spanking
- __Date__: Thu, 13 Nov 2003 04:56:51 -0600
"Greg Hanson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
<<<snip>>>
> Dan and Kane: Please deny it in much stronger tones.
Deny what?
> Then I get to watch you eat crow if I prove it.
Prove what?
> What have you got to lose?
I know where you read it.
Why don't you remember?
- Re: Ray attempts Biblical justification: was Re: U.N. rules Canada should ban spanking, (continued)
Re: Ray attempts Biblical justification: was Re: U.N. rules Canada should ban spanking,
Dan Sullivan
Ping SPD - Re: Happy Thanksgiving,
Kane
Re: Ray attempts Biblical justification: was Re: U.N. rules Canada should ban spanking,
Dan Sullivan
Re: Ray attempts Biblical justification: was Re: U.N. rules Canada should ban spanking,
Dan Sullivan
Re: Ray attempts Biblical justification: was Re: U.N. rules Canada should ban spanking,
Kane
Re: Ray attempts Biblical justification: was Re: U.N. rules Canada should ban spanking,
Greg Hanson
Re: Ray attempts Biblical justification: was Re: U.N. rules Canada should ban spanking,
Dan Sullivan
Re: Ray attempts Biblical justification: was Re: U.N. rules Canada should ban spanking,
Dennis Hancock