
www.Usenet.com
Group Index
Misc Thread Archive from Usenet.com
Re: Ray attempts Biblical justification: was Re: U.N. rules Canada should ban spanking
- __From__: Greg Hanson
- __Subject__: Re: Ray attempts Biblical justification: was Re: U.N. rules Canada should ban spanking
- __Date__: Thu, 13 Nov 2003 01:35:29 -0600
> Why would you use a religious story in a post to me?
In a newsgroup thread called "Ray attempts Biblical justification"?
Because like you the caseworker was a rabid Atheist,
and they projected their anti-Christian belief into
their work. I don't know where I read it, but I
read either the caseworker report or the court case,
and certainly rememember the rediculous logic.
They could remove the kids of ANY religious family that way.
Dan and Kane: Please deny it in much stronger tones.
Then I get to watch you eat crow if I prove it.
What have you got to lose?
- Re: Ray attempts Biblical justification: was Re: U.N. rules Canada should ban spanking, (continued)
Re: Ray attempts Biblical justification: was Re: U.N. rules Canada should ban spanking,
Dan Sullivan
Re: Ray attempts Biblical justification: was Re: U.N. rules Canada should ban spanking,
Kane
Re: Ray attempts Biblical justification: was Re: U.N. rules Canada should ban spanking,
Greg Hanson
Re: Ray attempts Biblical justification: was Re: U.N. rules Canada should ban spanking,
Greg Hanson
Re: Ray attempts Biblical justification: was Re: U.N. rules Canada should ban spanking,
Greg Hanson
Re: Ray attempts Biblical justification: was Re: U.N. rules Canada should ban spanking,
Dan Sullivan