
www.Usenet.com
| <-- __Chronological__ --> | <-- __Thread__ --> |
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>The heart of the "meat sacrificed to idols" debate is that eating it
>is in fact a matter of indifference to God; it IS NOT a genuine
>question or right or wrong. The weaker brother merely THINKS it is.
>If heathen can make a rock into an abomination, there isn't much of
>anything that, under some circumstances, is perfectly innocuous--but
>under other circumstances, is abhorrent to God's people.
I'm having a difficult time - at the moment - remembering which side of this
argument you're on.....
The weaker brother merely thinks it is wrong......
sometimes an abomination, other times perfectly innocuous........
You keep arguing the point that "OBJECT/ACTION XX" really ARE innocuous and
okay, when not turned into idols and not used by heathens, EXCEPT when the
discussion is specifically about Christmas trees used as mere decorations by
Christians.
Am I reading this right, or is it just me?
Dalene
| <-- __Chronological__ --> | <-- __Thread__ --> |