Re: Government churches should be constitutionally rabid

[EMAIL PROTECTED] (ambrose searle aka richard gardiner) wrote:

>:|A "reply" that has been thoroughly answered at
>:|http://groups.google.com/groups?selm=fe9a0c54.0311172019.274b6fb5%40posting.google.com

Actually I am glad you are doing this, because if anyone actually compares
the above with the below, they will not be impressed with that which you
are offering.


[ my reply]
Now in your wildest dreams.

What follows exposes your failed impotent, lame and irrelevant attempt to
discredit: 

My Reply will be found in the newly posted article
Christian Orthodoxy And The Founders
http://members.tripod.com/~candst/orthodox.htm

Let the readers decide

Two Items, one short, one quite long.

Let any readers who may venture into studying decide.

(1)  
http://makeashorterlink.com/?C10D12A96
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Was Thomas Jefferson a Christian
Newsgroups: alt.bible, alt.christnet.philosophy, alt.christnet.theology,
alt.religion.christian, alt.atheism
Date: 2002-06-04 04:35:59 PST

(2)

CHRISTIAN ORTHODOXY AND THE FOUNDERS 
Just some of the cited and excerpted sources used in this over all article
on the floowing 7 parts. There are duplications in some instances, in most
I tried to eliminate the duplications.

PART I
 http://makeashorterlink.com/?G1F132D96

PART II
http://makeashorterlink.com/?M21255D96

PART III
http://makeashorterlink.com/?L25245D96

PART IV
http://makeashorterlink.com/?E16263D96

PART V
http://makeashorterlink.com/?L37253D96

PART VI
 http://makeashorterlink.com/?Y38222D96

PART VII
http://makeashorterlink.com/?B29252D96
====================================

        **************************
Now for Ambrose Searle AKA Richard Gardiner's rambling discourse I add
this:  

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
[as Gray Shockley said:]
 (Your "opinion" is not an  adequate citation.)
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
 "Dave Thompson" said to another but it can be applied to Ambrose Searle
AKA Richard Gardiner as well
Ummmm, you are a historical troll that has been posting this dreck for a
while now. It doesn't matter if you stopped for a while or not. None of
your posts are new, they're just the same thing you've posted before and
have been shown to be baseless. You obviously don't like it when you've
been caught right in the beginning. I'm sure it won't stop you but at least
it serves notice to others that aren't familiar with you who they are
dealing with.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Take anything that Ambrose Searle aka Richard Gardiner types with a grain
of salt. As he has demonstrated time and time again in the past of several
years ago, the past of a year and half ago and finally quite recently,
truth and him with regards to posting are not on speaking terms.

 MY EVIDENCE:

*************************
Gardiner AKA Searle's church state posting history covering 3-99 to 902,
5/02 - 7/02 and this current year
http://makeashorterlink.com/?N16F22596
http://snurl.com/2ws8
http://makeashorterlink.com/?Q54F21596 (up to date as of 11/18/03)

*************************
http://makeashorterlink.com/?I2AF32596
http://snurl.com/2wsb
*************************